Posts Tagged ‘R&D’

Indian Investments in Germany: Innovation and R&D gain momentum in a stable partnership

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

Indian Investments in Germany:
Innovation and R&D Gain Momentum in a Stable Partnership

 

By: Rajnish Tiwari

Hamburg University of Technology

Institute of Technology and Innovation Management

Schwarzenbergstrasse 95, 21073 Hamburg, Germany

Tel. +49 – (0)40 – 42878 3776 Fax: +49 – (0)40 – 42878 2867

E-Mail: tiwari@tuhh.de

www.tuhh.de/tim; www.global-innovation.net

 

(August 2011)

 

Growth in Indian firms’ investments in Germany, by and large, continued to stay on a stable course between September 2010 and August 2011, since our last report in the IGCC Annual Review. In a maturing market we could observe some significant investment projects and a new and positive dimension in Indian subsidiaries’ operations in Germany: Ever more firms are discovering the merits of using Germany’s technological expertise and infrastructure for augmenting own R&D capabilities and innovation portfolios. This trend is fostered by the excellent growth that many Indian firms are witnessing in Germany at present.

 

Introduction

 

The recent financial crisis in the Euro zone notwithstanding Germany has emerged as a reliable economic powerhouse growing by an impressive 3.6% in 2010. A powerful combination involving a strong domestic base of 82 million consumers with relatively high purchasing power at their disposal, the world’s fourth largest gross domestic product (GDP) of nearly € 2.5 trillion, and the successful “made in Germany” brand in foreign trade keeps attracting many overseas investors to Germany. For instance, in May 2011, a worldwide survey by consultancy firm Ernst & Young declared Germany to be “the” most attractive FDI location within Europe. Not surprisingly, it has become the second largest recipient of foreign direct investments (FDI) in Europe, and the sixth largest recipient globally, having received over $ 46 billion (approx. € 35 billion) in FDI from foreign firms in 2010 as a recent report from UNCTAD reveals.

 

At the same time, private sector Indian firms, in their pursuit of expansion opportunities and technological know-how, have rapidly emerged as a significant source of FDI. In the 10-year period between March 2001 and March 2011 India’s outward FDI stock has increased nearly 38-fold, growing from $ 2.6 billion to $ 98.2 billion, according to official Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data. A more realistic figure can be expected to be on a significantly higher side because many FDI projects are carried out by overseas subsidiaries on behalf of the “mother” firm back home and are not necessarily incorporated in the official government data. Buoyed by the sustained economic growth of the previous years, Indian firms have been at the forefront of emerging market investors in Germany. According to one KPMG report more than every fourth acquisition in Germany (27%) carried out by an emerging market investor has Indian roots, followed by a distant second Russia (17%), and much ahead of China (5%).

 

Recent Developments in Indian FDI in Germany

 

Even though the official figures of the German Bundesbank continue to show significantly lower figures owing to statistical problems in officially assigning investment figures to firms with complex holding structures, global operations, and utilizing both local and global financing instruments, the stock of Indian FDI in Germany is estimated to stand at about € 4.5 billion as of August 2011. At least 11 FDI projects could be monitored between September 2010 and August 2011. These projects had an estimated volume of about $ 325 million.

 

Six of the projects were greenfield investments (including follow-up investments) while the others involved acquisitions. The Ruia Group (Meteor Gummiwerke), Thermax Ltd. (Omnical Kessel- und Apparatebau GmbH), and Hindustan National Glass and Industries (Agenda Glas AG) were amongst the major acquirers in Germany in this period. The Hinduja Group, too, made an unsuccessful bid to acquire German power company Steag with estimated assets of approx. € 3.5 billion. Wind energy firm Suzlon decided to increase its stake in Hamburg-based REpower Systems SE from 91.7% to 95.16% with an intention to acquire the full control.

 

Interestingly, the federal state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern saw two Indian investments (by Suzlon in a joint venture with its own subsidiary REpower, any by Kenersys) in the field of wind energy, thus underscoring the potential that the regions in the eastern part of Germany hold for Indian firms.

Table 1: Developments in Indian FDI in Germany between January 2009 and August 2010

Key indicators Aug. 2010 Aug. 2011
No. of Indian MNCs in Germany 134 139
No. of subsidiaries of Indian MNCs in Germany 190 195
Full time regular employees of Indian MNCs in Germany* 18,600§ 22,000
Estimated stock of Indian FDI in Germany € 4.125 billion € 4. 5 billion

 

* This figure does not include the approx. 3,600 employees of the Luxemburg-based Mittal Group.

§ This figure has been re-adjusted after getting authoritative data on Corus / Tata Steel’s employement.

 

Taking into consideration the investments and divestments in this period we could count 139 India-headquartered MNCs and their 195 subsidiaries (majority stakes and wholly-owned businesses) active in Germany as of August 2011. This figure also does not include holding companies and dependent firms within given concern structures.

 

Employment in Germany

 

Subsidiaries of Indian firms in Germany are estimated to have approx. 22,000 regular employees on their payroll on a full-time annual average. Additionally, there were about 1,000 trainees and interns, which are not included in the figures below.

 


 

Table 2: Top-5 Indian employers in Germany in fiscal year 2009-10

 

No. German Firm Indian Stakeholder Employees

1

Meteor Gummiwerke Ruia Group

2,421

2

Novelis Deutschland GmbH Hindalco (Aditya Birla Group)

2,212

3

SONA BLW Präzisionsschmiede GmbH Sona Group

1,379

4

REpower Systems SE Suzlon Energy Ltd

1,287

5

Corus Deutschland GmbH Tata Steel

1,166

 

Source: Author’s compilation based on companies’ last available official annual report.

 

This figure has been re-adjusted after having estimated the number of employees of Indian firms as standing at 23,600 the previous year. The authoritative headcount of Tata Steel (Corus) has been found to stand at a much lower 1,166 than the one reported last year in this space (6,100), which was based on an online database entry that was apparently erroneous. The new figure is based on an annual report filed by Tata Steel.

 

It may also be noted that the total employment provided by the business group of the Indian stakeholder might be much higher. For example, conglomerates such as the Ruia Group and the Tata Group, have multiple presence in Germany and their total employment would stand at significantly higher than the figures above suggest.

 

Performance of Indian firms in Germany

 

Germany seems to provide a highly attractive yet challenging playground for Indian firms. While analyzing annual reports of about 50 Indian subsidiaries for fiscal year ending in 2010 or 2011 we find examples of both high growth and severe struggle. While firms generally coped well with the given market parameters, some firms managed to outperform the market growing with a double-digit figure exceeding 20%. At the same time a few firms (e.g. logistics, automobile ancillaries, and clinical research) recorded negative growth in the turn-over exceeding well over 20%. In one instance the firm suffered a severe setback with the turn-over decreasing on a year-to-year basis by as much as over 75%, coming down to less approx. € 2.5 million from over € 10 million. Such incidences underscore the competitive and challenging nature of the German market and the subsequent need for continuous alert. Generally, firms having a broader customer base, experienced local management, collaborative practices, and a supportive business network consisting of suppliers, customers, institutional players, and other firms are less prone to such abrupt shocks.

 

R&D and Innovation

Slowly but surely Indian firms are recognizing the need of cutting-edge technologies and an innovative product portfolio in a competitive globalized world. While some FDI decisions are directly motivated by the desire to seek access to technological know-how, in other instances technological set-up such as a functioning Research and Development (R&D) department is acquired as a package deal. At any rate, we can now observe several Indian firms actively making use of Germany’s advanced engineering capabilities and technical infrastructure.

 

For instance, while Tech Mahindra has opened a development centre in Bonn, Suzlon and REpower Systems SE have founded a joint venture called Renewable Energy Technology Center (RETC) with offices in Hamburg and Rostock with an express purpose of doing basic research in the field of renewable energies. REpower itself provides an excellent example of successful R&D by Indian subsidiaries in Germany: In fiscal year 2010/11 it increased its R&D expenditure by over 40% from € 25.6 million in the previous year to € 36.9 million. Its annual report proudly mentions successful commercialization of several new products. The R&D efforts also paid rich dividends in that the firm could generate € 7.5 million in license fee (0.6% of the total turn-over). Some of the firms, apart from those listed in

Table 2, participating in the “global innovation” value-chain in Germany are listed below:

 

Table 3: Examples of some Indian firms with successful R&D activities in Germany

 

No. German Firm Indian Stakeholder Products/Patents
1 MBE Coal & Minerals Technology McNally Bharat

Yes

2 Minda KTSN Plastic Solutions Minda Group

Yes

3 Ecron Acunova GmbH Manipal Acunova

Yes

4 Eisenwerk Erla GmbH Dynamatic Group

Yes

5 Lloyd Dynamowerke Kirloskar Group

Yes

 

Source: Author’s compilation based on companies’ last available official annual report.

 

One interesting aspect, though, is that apart from Tech Mahindra hardly any other big IT company from India is using Germany for innovation and R&D activities. Most firms are singularly focused on delivery, which probably has been the reason why their growth has not yet realized its full potential.

 

Summary

As evident from the data described above, India is not only “the” top emerging economy investor in Germany but also that Indian investments here have remained stable with an increasing monetary volume. At the same time however, one gains the impression that the Indian FDI in Germany has not kept pace with the rapid growth of overall Indian overseas investments. The reason for this development might be three-fold:

  • First, Indian firms, of late, have started to look “south”, i.e. to other developing countries as investment destination. This finding is also corroborated by a KPMG study.
  • Second, economic recovery in Germany has reduced financial woes of firms so that the general availability of distressed assets has gone down shrinking the pool of suitable acquisition targets.
  • Finally, Indian firms continue to demonstrate a strong preference for acquisitions in Anglo-Saxon countries. According to the Emerging Markets International Acquisition Tracker (EMIAT) of KPMG as much as 64% of all developed country acquisitions by Indian firms in 2010 were carried out in 4 Anglo-Saxon countries (USA, UK, Canada and Australia), with USA alone cornering a lion’s share of 35%.

 

The EMIAT data also reveal that even though Germany remains highly preferred by Indian firms outside the Anglo-Saxon countries, France and Singapore are beginning to challenge Germany’s attractiveness for Indian firms. Therefore, it seems appropriate to call upon both firms and institutional players in Germany and India to further work on maintaining the momentum of the growing bilateral relations. The “win-win” proposition of the bilateral cooperation is very much self-sustaining. Germany’s excellent physical infrastructure and innovation prowess and India’s strengths in production, marketing, low-cost engineering, and business model innovations can generate a unique competitive advantage.

 

Summarizing, we can say that Germany has established itself and continues to be a preferred and stable partner for Indian firms in their pursuit of overseas growth and technological advancement. The growing R&D engagement of Indian firms in Germany is a welcome sign for bilateral technological collaboration on the path of sustainable development with positive effects for all concerned. Furthermore, it underscores that globalization is not a one-way street and that high-tech jobs can withstand the cost pressure. Collaboration and cooperation, therefore, works both ways and we might be entering an era of “Indian innovations, made in Germany”.

 

About the author

Diplom-Kaufmann Rajnish Tiwari is a Research Associate at the Institute for Technology and Innovation Management at Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH). He has done extensive research on Indo-German business relations especially in the knowledge-intensive field of innovation collaboration. Additionally, he heads the German-Indian Round Table (GIRT) in Hamburg and is one of the founding partners of the initiative “India Week Hamburg” which was started in 2007.

Note:

This article appeared in the “Annual Review 2011″ of the Indo-German Chamber of Commerce, pp. 119-123. A digital copy is available at: http://www.global-innovation.net/team/tiwari/PDF/Tiwari_IGCC_2011.pdf  (PDF, approx. 1 MB)

Science and technology: falling patent quality hits innovation, says OECD

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

Source: OECD press release, dated 20.09.2011:

20/09/2011 – The quality of patent filings has fallen dramatically over the past two decades. The rush to protect even minor improvements in products or services is overburdening patent offices. This slows the time to market for true innovations and reduces the potential for breakthrough inventions, according to a new OECD report.

The Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011finds that patent quality has declined by an average of around 20 per cent between the 1990s and 2000s, a pattern seen in nearly all countries studied.Studying patent quality in different sectors has also allowed the OECD to assess which countries are doing best in innovation. The United Kingdom, for example, produces semiconductor and environmental technology patents that are above average in quality.

 

Korea has a competitive advantage in ICT-related innovations. And Germany is strong at innovating in solar energy.

Patents from inventors in the United States, Germany and Japan are the most highly cited, which suggests they are true innovations being used by many firms in their products to generate further innovations.

 

But while these countries produced about 70% of the top 1% of highly cited patents between 1996 and 2000,  their share had fallen to 60% five years later.

 

The Nordic countries and China, India and Korea have seen their share increase of highly cited patents. The European Union is leading in clean energy technologies, representing nearly 40% of all filings by the late 2000s, followed by the US and Japan. In this area, China now ranks 8th worldwide.

 

The OECD report ranks research by universities worldwide. Overall, 40 of the top 50 are located in the United States, with the rest in Europe. But a more diverse picture emerges when looking at subject areas. In social sciences, for example, the UK leads with 16 of the top 50 institutions after the US. And there is growing evidence that universities in Asia are emerging as leading research institutions: China has 6 in the top 50 in pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics. And Hong Kong University is among the best in computer science, engineering and chemistry.

 

The US leads the world in research and development (R&D), with around USD 400 billion of spending on R&D in 2009. China is today second, with over one third of that total, followed by Japan. The European Union as a whole spent about USD 300 billion in 2009.

 

The Scoreboard tracks trends in science, technology and industry to understand how innovation is evolving and how countries are positioning themselves in the global knowledge economy. It includes more than 180 internationally comparable quality indicators and provides a broad range of statistics for other major economies such as Brazil, China, India, and the Russian Federation.

 

The complete Scoreboard 2011 is available at www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard and provides easy access to individual sections and links to the databases used. Each indicator is also downloadable in PDF format.

 

For further information about this report, please contact Alessandra Colecchia (tel. + 33 1 45 24 94 12), OECD’s Science, Technology and Industry Directorate.

OECD: “Pseudo-Erfindungen erschweren Marktzugang für Innovationen”

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

Quelle: Pressemitteilung der OECD, 20.09.2011.

(Paris/Berlin – 20. September 2011) Deutschland hat im Zeitraum 2000 bis 2005 so viele Patente im Europäischen Patentamt registriert wie kein anderes Land auf der Welt. Gleichzeitig verschlechtert sich die Qualität von Patentanmeldungen auch hierzulande seit zwei Jahrzehnten und verlängert so die Zeit, die neue Produkte brauchen, um schließlich auf den Markt zu gelangen. Das geht aus der jüngsten OECD-Publikation zu Wissenschaft und Industrie, dem “Science, Technology and Industry Scorebard 2011” hervor, das heute von der Organisation für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung veröffentlicht wurde.

 

Mit beinahe 70.000 Patenten war Deutschland zwischen 2000 und 2005 innovativer als die USA mit knapp 60.000 und Japan mit 48.500 Patenten. Die Qualität der Patentanmeldungen ist in den drei Ländern im internationalen Vergleich hoch. Allerdings hält sogar hier ein Trend Einzug, der Experten Sorgen macht: Unternehmen versuchen, selbst kleinste Veränderungen an altbekannten Produkten oder Dienstleistungen patentieren zu lassen und belasten die Patentämter mit Anträgen, die schließlich negativ beschieden werden. Marktbrechende Erfindungen hätten es in diesem Wust von Einreichungen entsprechend schwerer, sich abzuheben, wahre Innovationen würden behindert, kritisieren die Experten.

 

Kamen zwischen 1996 und 2000 noch 70 Prozent der Top-Patente, die das Europäische Patentamt vergab, aus den USA, Deutschland und Japan, so lag dieser Anteil fünf Jahre später bei nur noch 60 Prozent. Verantwortlich ist ein spürbarer Rückgang in den USA und Japan, während der Anteil deutscher Top-Patente stabil blieb. Dafür betreten China, Indien und Korea im Jahr 2000 die Bühne der besten Innovationen, auf der bis dahin nur westliche Länder gespielt hatten.

 

 

Allgemein ist die Qualität der Patentanträge dem Bericht zufolge seit 1990 jedoch um 20 Prozent gefallen. Im Schnitt wird nur jede vierte Anmeldung akzeptiert. Am höchsten ist die Vergabequote der in Europa geschützten Patente in relativ jungen Bereichen, wie zum Beispiel bei erneuerbaren Energien, Nanotechnologie und IT-Methoden. Deutschland ist bei Innovationen in der Solarenergie besonders stark.

 

Die größten Summen für Forschung und Entwicklung wenden noch immer die USA auf: 400 Milliarden US-Dollar investierte das Land im Jahr 2009 in seine wissenschaftliche und wirtschaftliche Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. China und Japan folgen mit knapp einem Drittel dieser Summe an Platz zwei und drei. Gemessen an der Wirtschaftskraft führen allerdings Finnland und Schweden mit Ausgaben von 4,0 beziehungsweise 3,6 Prozent ihres Bruttoinlandsproduktes.

 

Das OECD-Scoreboard für Wissenschaft, Technologie und Industrie verfolgt die globalen Trends in diesen Bereichen und versucht, sichtbar zu machen, wie sich einzelne Länder in der Wissensgesellschaft aufstellen. Der Bericht beruht auf 180 international vergleichbaren Indikatoren und liefert außerdem statistisches Material für wichtige Länder außerhalb der OECD: Brasilien, Indien, China und Russland.

 

Die Publikation steht auf der OECD iLibrary Website zur freien Verfügung. Einzelne Indikatoren können auch als PDF runtergeladen werden.

 

> zur Hauptseite “Science, Technology and Industry Scorebard 2011

 

Quelle: Pressemitteilung der OECD, 20.09.2011.